by Mizery_Made » Tue Nov 29, 2011 1:13 am
das Monkey wrote:
That's what I'm doing now. Was hoping for a better solution so I could free up a Custom field, but maybe we'll get more in the future.
(In theory, at least) You could "hijack" another field and use it as a "catch all." For example, if you're not using the "Quality" field, then you could use this field with values such as "Loose track : Yes" to designate your loose tracks, then also use it for values like "Rated : Yes" if you like you note which tracks/albums you've given a proper rating (trying to migrate from my old simplistic "5 or no star" system, lol). One of the benefits of this is, this field is a Multi-Value field and thus will have a tree node showing all of these various tags. Then, you could use an Auto-Playlist criteria of "Quality NOT 'Loose track : Yes'" to filter out your random tracks.
Then, you could take the Magic Nodes "Involved People" node example and use it for this field which would split up the various "categories" into their own tree nodes for you to navigate. That's what I've done with the Composer field and my "Production" information. It allows me to designate between "Producer", "Co Producer", "Additional Production", etc. Neat little feature.
However, for your specific example, to mark whether a track is a "loose track" or from a full album... I've been using the "Grouping" field. I have no other use for it, and I feel the field's name lends itself to my usage of it. I mark "loose files" with "--Misc--" and those from full albums with "--Album--" and use filters and auto-organize rules to filter and rename accordingly.
[quote="das Monkey"][quote="Lowlander"]3) Yes, if you use a Custom field for this purpose (also see: http://www.mediamonkey.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=47744&hilit=album+missing+tracks)
[/quote]
That's what I'm doing now. Was hoping for a better solution so I could free up a Custom field, but maybe we'll get more in the future.[/quote]
(In theory, at least) You could "hijack" another field and use it as a "catch all." For example, if you're not using the "Quality" field, then you could use this field with values such as "Loose track : Yes" to designate your loose tracks, then also use it for values like "Rated : Yes" if you like you note which tracks/albums you've given a proper rating (trying to migrate from my old simplistic "5 or no star" system, lol). One of the benefits of this is, this field is a Multi-Value field and thus will have a tree node showing all of these various tags. Then, you could use an Auto-Playlist criteria of "Quality NOT 'Loose track : Yes'" to filter out your random tracks.
Then, you could take the Magic Nodes "Involved People" node example and use it for this field which would split up the various "categories" into their own tree nodes for you to navigate. That's what I've done with the Composer field and my "Production" information. It allows me to designate between "Producer", "Co Producer", "Additional Production", etc. Neat little feature.
However, for your specific example, to mark whether a track is a "loose track" or from a full album... I've been using the "Grouping" field. I have no other use for it, and I feel the field's name lends itself to my usage of it. I mark "loose files" with "--Misc--" and those from full albums with "--Album--" and use filters and auto-organize rules to filter and rename accordingly.