Page 2 of 2
Re: Let me be blunt
Posted: Sun Aug 20, 2017 7:56 pm
by Red Maw
I agree with that concept. All I and anyone else really cares about is that there we have a field to the put data we want to into. I will have to look into the CustomX stuff - if it can be renamed so to reflect the contents then that is a perfect solution. While "find Custom1=x" works, "find Artist=x" is much better.
Re: Let me be blunt
Posted: Mon Aug 21, 2017 1:44 am
by Barry4679
TIV73 wrote:The CustomX tags are an ideal solution for this issue. They allow a user to save exactly what data he wants, and I believe I somewhere saw an option to change the label of the fields.
I haven't tried it myself, but it is at Tools|Options|Library|Appearance
TIV73 wrote:Everything is great, until somebody needs more than 5 custom tags.
Or somebody wants a numeric field; ie one which doesn't sort like
1
11
2
3
etc
Some custom date fields would be great also.
Re: Let me be blunt
Posted: Mon Aug 28, 2017 9:46 am
by jiri
Request of more and better Custom fields added as
http://www.ventismedia.com/mantis/view.php?id=14365.
Thanks,
Jiri
Re: Let me be blunt
Posted: Mon Aug 28, 2017 1:06 pm
by MMFrLife
5 more would be great as long as they are coded to write to the tag like the original 5 (no 'MM only' stuff).
Big Libraries
Posted: Mon Sep 04, 2017 9:00 pm
by zee566
My mp3 library is nearly 300,000 cuts. Can 5 handle it?
Re: Let me be blunt
Posted: Mon Sep 18, 2017 2:48 pm
by Lowlander
It should *, it's designed to be faster than MM4.
* Hardware does matter with larger Libraries. Especially hard drive speed of the database can impact how fast MediaMonkey reacts.
Re: Let me be blunt
Posted: Mon Sep 25, 2017 12:02 pm
by MMFrLife
MMFrLife wrote:5 more would be great as long as they are coded to write to the tag like the original 5 (no 'MM only' stuff).
Also, if you could make them 'multi-item' capable. Is that even possible with the Custom Fields?
10 overall!
(5 plain, 5 multi-item)
equals -->
custom fields issue put to rest 