Hi ... Does anyone know where I can purchase legit FLAC classic rock tunes ?
Thanks

Moderator: Gurus
m00nd0g wrote:So if I use my bought CD's I can convert it to FLAC ?
Samuel_LB wrote:m00nd0g wrote:So if I use my bought CD's I can convert it to FLAC ?
Sure! Among other format types.
Absolutextasi wrote:would WAV be the equivalent to FLAC? I mean it's nice that Flac is lossless, but once you convert it, it not loseless anymore right or do I just not understand the purpose of FLAC? I definitely downloaded a number of Flac files and they're incredible big, but they don't play. And I definitely wouldn't to keep them so I convert them. Once I convert them to 320 or 192 they are immediately half the size. Doesn't this mean they are no longer lossless? Someone please explain this to me because I'm getting a headache really fast and I feel like this is really important for me to know.
Thanks,
Mikey
nohitter151 wrote:Absolutextasi wrote:would WAV be the equivalent to FLAC? I mean it's nice that Flac is lossless, but once you convert it, it not loseless anymore right or do I just not understand the purpose of FLAC? I definitely downloaded a number of Flac files and they're incredible big, but they don't play. And I definitely wouldn't to keep them so I convert them. Once I convert them to 320 or 192 they are immediately half the size. Doesn't this mean they are no longer lossless? Someone please explain this to me because I'm getting a headache really fast and I feel like this is really important for me to know.
Thankyou. So from your perspective, what would you suggest that I convert it to (lossy format) and why?
Mikey
Yes, FLAC is a lossless audio format, so it's equivalent to WAV files. Its advantages over WAV audio is that FLAC files are compressed so they are usually about half the file size of an equivalent wav file while offering the exact same audio quality. It also has better, more standardized metadata (with vorbis comments). If you convert them to a lossy format like mp3, wma, m4a, ogg, etc. then yes, they are no longer lossless.

Absolutextasi wrote:Thankyou. So from your perspective, what would you suggest that I convert it to (lossy format) and why?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests