Did I say that I don't need/like a new tabbed interface as well?

Moderator: Gurus
According to: http://www.jirihajek.net/MMwiki/index.php/MM_4.0_UImalachisecretspy wrote:im not sure i need the video support either.i like music.im plkeased that theyre addin it so if i need to i can use a player i trust,but doesnt anyone else think that a standard version of mm without the vid support be available too?i dunno,i just dont see myself using it alot,would it use more resources just being there if its not used?will it make the program alot bigger?cheers for any replies
Before continuing, it's worth mentioning that with the addition of Video support, there's a danger of MM becoming a bloated application that no longer meets the needs of 'serious music listeners'. Thus, one of the overarching objectives of this release _must_ be to further _improve_ the performance of MediaMonkey--the changes being made should not slow it down whether it be from a DB perspective OR a UI perspective.
Maybe you didn't understand me. From my perspective, MM is first and foremost a media manager as well. I don't mind to have a possibility to organize video collections. Actually, I really would like to replace the mentioned video database with MediaMonkey.rusty wrote:From my perspective, MM is first and foremost, a Media Manager.
Let's see. I just summed it up to get a bit of an overview... I refer to 1345ZvezdanD wrote:dedicated fields for video/audio codecs, audio/video bitrate (stored independently) and all other that I have mentioned
How about this:pietzke wrote:actors - implemented as Properties but not yet availible as nodes and columns