by Kupuna » Fri Sep 09, 2016 10:55 pm
I've been ripping disks (using MM) and sending them into a remote directory where I set up a directory structure and naming protocol to suit my needs. In some instances, the ripped tracks are four folder levels down (classical rips/russian/rachmaninoff/concerto 3). When I went to scan my work into the MM database, MM listed a number of missing or moved tracks. I know the tracks are there, and I can play them directly from the ripped folders. Are the folders too "deep" for MM to find?
In reading help for this problem, I get the idea that I should have been using MM in a different way to do most of the work rather than creating my own structure.
Taking a one-disk example: Disk contains two classical compositions. Rip them separately since I don't want them played end to end. Store them in separate folders I created. Hopefully get MM to scan what I did and pull the rips into the database, divided as I intended.
I think I'm in trouble here
Any help or advice welcomed.
I've been ripping disks (using MM) and sending them into a remote directory where I set up a directory structure and naming protocol to suit my needs. In some instances, the ripped tracks are four folder levels down (classical rips/russian/rachmaninoff/concerto 3). When I went to scan my work into the MM database, MM listed a number of missing or moved tracks. I know the tracks are there, and I can play them directly from the ripped folders. Are the folders too "deep" for MM to find?
In reading help for this problem, I get the idea that I should have been using MM in a different way to do most of the work rather than creating my own structure.
Taking a one-disk example: Disk contains two classical compositions. Rip them separately since I don't want them played end to end. Store them in separate folders I created. Hopefully get MM to scan what I did and pull the rips into the database, divided as I intended.
I think I'm in trouble here :o Any help or advice welcomed.