by drakinite » Tue Jun 30, 2020 7:15 pm
Aha, I found out what it is! It looks like the large icon was entirely intentional.
Inside MediaMonkey.VisualElementsManifest.xml:
Code: Select all
<Application xmlns:xsi='http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance'>
<VisualElements
ShowNameOnSquare150x150Logo='on'
Square150x150Logo='Assets\BigLogo.png'
Square70x70Logo='Assets\StoreLogo.png'
ForegroundText='light'
BackgroundColor='#0078d7' />
</Application>
Lo and behold, BigLogo.png and StoreLogo.png are the full-size icons that were perplexing all of us.
EDIT: Oh, whoops, now I see what you meant in the previous post. I didn't realize you were already aware of the intentional 150x150 png and you were asking for ideas as to why it was showing up that way. Facepalm aside, my suggestion is below:
I believe that Microsoft does a pretty good job at their Square150x150Logo and Square70x70Logo sizing/positioning; Maybe MM's logo could use the same sizing, to help promote a consistent design across the platform. Here, let me put them in this post so you can see:
VS Code:
Office: (you can also look in C:\Program Files\Microsoft Office\root\Office16\LogoImages)
...Also.. also.. ALSO–
I have a CRAZY idea.
What if different skins can have access to the logo files and/or background color? So if you use the Material Dark, the logo changes to be black and orange, but if you use Black Monkey, it goes to brown and light yellow, etc.
Here's an example of what I'm imagining:
And yes- I will be setting the logo/background to that of the first image for my own install. I like it too much. ;P
Aha, I found out what it is! It looks like the large icon was entirely intentional.
Inside MediaMonkey.VisualElementsManifest.xml:
[code]<Application xmlns:xsi='http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance'>
<VisualElements
ShowNameOnSquare150x150Logo='on'
Square150x150Logo='Assets\BigLogo.png'
Square70x70Logo='Assets\StoreLogo.png'
ForegroundText='light'
BackgroundColor='#0078d7' />
</Application>
[/code]
Lo and behold, BigLogo.png and StoreLogo.png are the full-size icons that were perplexing all of us.
[i][b]EDIT:[/b] Oh, whoops, now I see what you meant in the previous post. I didn't realize you were already aware of the intentional 150x150 png and you were asking for ideas as to why it was showing up that way. Facepalm aside, my suggestion is below:[/i]
I believe that Microsoft does a pretty good job at their Square150x150Logo and Square70x70Logo sizing/positioning; Maybe MM's logo could use the same sizing, to help promote a consistent design across the platform. Here, let me put them in this post so you can see:
VS Code:
[img]https://i.imgur.com/sWcXOxt.png[/img] [img]https://i.imgur.com/xhmrtqh.png[/img]
Office: (you can also look in C:\Program Files\Microsoft Office\root\Office16\LogoImages)
[img]https://i.imgur.com/aPs3SxK.png[/img] [img]https://i.imgur.com/uKq6bIm.png[/img] [img]https://i.imgur.com/kZ1XrEY.png[/img] [img]https://i.imgur.com/vAAcMch.png[/img]
...Also.. also.. ALSO–
I have a CRAZY idea.
What if different skins can have access to the logo files and/or background color? So if you use the Material Dark, the logo changes to be black and orange, but if you use Black Monkey, it goes to brown and light yellow, etc.
Here's an example of what I'm imagining:
[img]https://i.imgur.com/Ld63LFC.png[/img] [img]https://i.imgur.com/YUDkgPU.png[/img]
And yes- I will be setting the logo/background to that of the first image for my own install. I like it too much. ;P
