by Scooter » Fri Jan 25, 2008 5:29 pm
You will need a turntable and software. I also use "Spin It Again". I hate their wave editor, and use "GoldWave" instead. Both pieces of software are about $30.
I have 1,000's of records, and quite frankly, the time, effort and quality of the recordings made with this set up is rarely worth it. You have to work in real time, so a 45 minute record takes 45 minutes of your time to record. You have generally boost the volume and take out pops and scratches with a wave editor (10 min). You have to split the tracks (automatic track splitters are not perfect) (10 min.) You have name the new tracks, scan them into MM and convert them to flac or mp3 (10 min).
So for each record, I spend about 1.5 hours.
The used CD of the same record can be as cheap as a couple bucks off ebay or Amazon.
Bottom Line: Unless the record is very rare, then you are better off with CD versions. Exception: Beatles, which is highly compressed over saturated mixes which sound awful on CD.
You will need a turntable and software. I also use "Spin It Again". I hate their wave editor, and use "GoldWave" instead. Both pieces of software are about $30.
I have 1,000's of records, and quite frankly, the time, effort and quality of the recordings made with this set up is rarely worth it. You have to work in real time, so a 45 minute record takes 45 minutes of your time to record. You have generally boost the volume and take out pops and scratches with a wave editor (10 min). You have to split the tracks (automatic track splitters are not perfect) (10 min.) You have name the new tracks, scan them into MM and convert them to flac or mp3 (10 min).
So for each record, I spend about 1.5 hours.
The used CD of the same record can be as cheap as a couple bucks off ebay or Amazon.
Bottom Line: Unless the record is very rare, then you are better off with CD versions. Exception: Beatles, which is highly compressed over saturated mixes which sound awful on CD.