by chrisjj » Fri May 23, 2008 1:25 pm
Clarification... hmmm. ;)
All I see is a mention in one example ("<Year:3>") of an exception ("this latter example is an exception") to an exception ("numeric fields are normally not truncated") that is not identified an an exception... and that's not what I'd call clarification.
The behaviour is now so irregular - the effect varies from field to field, value to type and even length to length - that I think Help must spell it out. If that looks silly, well, perhaps the designer might want to ponder why ;)
Either way, "numeric fields are normally not truncated" should surely read "numeric values are not otherwise truncated", because e.g. Track 1/10 is.
Clarification... hmmm. ;)
All I see is a mention in one example ("<Year:3>") of an exception ("this latter example is an exception") to an exception ("numeric fields are normally not truncated") that is not identified an an exception... and that's not what I'd call clarification.
The behaviour is now so irregular - the effect varies from field to field, value to type and even length to length - that I think Help must spell it out. If that looks silly, well, perhaps the designer might want to ponder why ;)
Either way, "numeric fields are normally not truncated" should surely read "numeric values are not otherwise truncated", because e.g. Track 1/10 is.