1237 Date stored in wrong WMA tag name! [#5968]

Post a reply

Smilies
:D :) :( :o :-? 8) :lol: :x :P :oops: :cry: :evil: :roll: :wink:

BBCode is ON
[img] is ON
[url] is ON
Smilies are ON

Topic review
   

Expand view Topic review: 1237 Date stored in wrong WMA tag name! [#5968]

Re: 1237 Date stored in wrong WMA tag name!

by chrisjj » Thu Jul 09, 2009 5:17 pm

> The link that you provided doesn't resolve,

Failure of this forum's auto-urlling now workedaround - thanks.

> as far as I can tell, Release Date is an attribute that isn't saved to WMA tags.

Fair enough.

> I'm not saying that this is the ideal scenario--I would have preferred if there was a
> wm/ReleaseDate standard--but there doesn't seem to be one.

OK.

Thanks.

Re: 1237 Date stored in wrong WMA tag name!

by chrisjj » Thu Jul 09, 2009 5:16 pm

> chrisjj, please don't edit others posts to reply,

My profuse apologies to Rusty and all!! I clearly hit Edit instead of Quote.

> clicked it makes for too much confusion.

Not to mention misrepresentation!

For the record I have moved my text out to a separate message but sadly have no way to restore Rusty's.

Re: 1237 Date stored in wrong WMA tag name!

by nohitter151 » Thu Jul 09, 2009 4:47 pm

rusty wrote:> The link that you provided doesn't resolve,

Failure of this forum's auto-urlling now workedaround - thanks.

> as far as I can tell, Release Date is an attribute that isn't saved to WMA tags.

Fair enough.

> I'm not saying that this is the ideal scenario--I would have preferred if there was a
> wm/ReleaseDate standard--but there doesn't seem to be one.

OK.

Thanks.
chrisjj, please don't edit others posts to reply, it makes for too much confusion.

Re: 1237 Date stored in wrong WMA tag name!

by rusty » Wed May 06, 2009 5:13 pm

EDITed by chrisjj in error!

Some of the original text was:

> The link that you provided doesn't resolve,
> as far as I can tell, Release Date is an attribute that isn't saved to WMA tags.
> I'm not saying that this is the ideal scenario--I would have preferred if there was a
> wm/ReleaseDate standard--but there doesn't seem to be one.

Re: 1237 Date stored in wrong WMA tag name!

by chrisjj » Tue May 05, 2009 7:28 pm

I see the documentation has been adjusted to match current behaviour: http://www.ventismedia.com/mantis/view. ... 564#c17677 .

I think this leaves outstanding the bug described by this slight adjustment to the report:

1 In a WMA track Date field, enter 1925-11-30
2 Examine in hex editor

Expected: date stored in Year (actually WM/Year) and ReleaseDate.
Observed: date stored in Year (actually WM/Year) and OriginalReleaseTime

Note: There is no such standard tag as OriginalReleaseTime - see EDIT: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library ... S.85).aspx

EDIT: Covered at http://www.mediamonkey.com/forum/viewto ... =7&t=42797

Re: 1237 Date stored in wrong WMA tag name!

by rusty » Wed Apr 29, 2009 5:09 pm

Looking into exactly what happened here.
Tracked at http://www.ventismedia.com/mantis/view.php?id=5564

-Rusty

1237 Date stored in wrong WMA tag name! [#5968]

by chrisjj » Wed Apr 29, 2009 11:08 am

1 In a WMA track Date field, enter 1925-11-30
2 Examine in hex editor

Expected: date stored in Year (actually WM/Year) and ReleaseDate, as per Help.
Observed: date stored in Year (actually WM/Year) and OriginalReleaseTime

Note: There is no such standard tag as OriginalReleaseTime - see EDIT: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library ... S.85).aspx

It would be helpful to hear from the Devs confirmation that this bug is considered to be one of behaviour rather than of documentation. Thanks.

Top