Are you sure this is fixed? I just tested the latest Beta builds (both 2.5.4.974 and 2.5.4.975) and the issues I originally described are still occurring.
I've posted a test file here:
http://www.unzerpum.net/temp/WavTagOrder.zip (55KB)
The WAV file inside the ZIP file was edited using versions .974 and .975. It's still appending new LIST INFO blocks to the end of the file after every edit, and it's still stopping at the first LIST INFO or ID3 block when it reads tags. (Look at the WAV file in a hex editor to see what I mean.) When I bring up the WAV file in MediaMonkey, it should display the following tags:
Title: "WAVE TAG 8"
Artist: "Tagged by MediaMonkey (Beta 975) (Second Try)"
Album Artist: "Tagged by MediaMonkey (Beta 975) (Second Try)"
Instead, it's displaying the original MusicMatch data, regardless of how many times I edit the tags:
Title: "WAVE TAG 1"
Artist: "Tagged by MusicMatch Jukebox"
Album Artist: "Tagged by MusicMatch Jukebox"
(See my original message for steps to reproduce this.)
Any ideas? Am I missing something?
Thanks,
--- Scott
Are you sure this is fixed? I just tested the latest Beta builds (both 2.5.4.974 and 2.5.4.975) and the issues I originally described are still occurring.
I've posted a test file here:
[url]http://www.unzerpum.net/temp/WavTagOrder.zip[/url] (55KB)
The WAV file inside the ZIP file was edited using versions .974 and .975. It's still appending new LIST INFO blocks to the end of the file after every edit, and it's still stopping at the first LIST INFO or ID3 block when it reads tags. (Look at the WAV file in a hex editor to see what I mean.) When I bring up the WAV file in MediaMonkey, it should display the following tags:
Title: "WAVE TAG 8"
Artist: "Tagged by MediaMonkey (Beta 975) (Second Try)"
Album Artist: "Tagged by MediaMonkey (Beta 975) (Second Try)"
Instead, it's displaying the original MusicMatch data, regardless of how many times I edit the tags:
Title: "WAVE TAG 1"
Artist: "Tagged by MusicMatch Jukebox"
Album Artist: "Tagged by MusicMatch Jukebox"
(See my original message for steps to reproduce this.)
Any ideas? Am I missing something?
Thanks,
--- Scott