Good Results for MM

by **mjs93** » Thu Feb 08, 2007 2:34 pm

A huge reason why I love MM is that it's fast and not a resource hog. Another is because it easily allows practically total control over tagging, file management, etc., which I'm OCD about. lol I tried using iTunes for a bit and I just felt so restricted (not to mention my computer was slowing down).

by **MarineBrat** » Thu Feb 08, 2007 12:02 pm

I like it because it's a DATABASE first and foremost. I can do any type of manipulation I like by simply dumping a table out to dBase, using dBase tools to rearrange data, and then host it back to MDB. Then I sync the database changes into the MP3's.

by **Blake** » Thu Feb 08, 2007 6:11 am

Sorry for posting in an old topic but...

HAVE A LOOK AT THIS!!

http://www.alexa.com/data/details/traff ... monkey.com

by **Nebbin** » Tue Oct 24, 2006 2:39 pm

Hooah wrote:I also like how it can handle large libraries. 65k songs and MM chugs along.

I know this was a major factor for me staying with MM all this time. Testing other software with even 20k tracks showed serious slowdowns. Has anyone tested large libraries with the new WMP 11 Beta 2? (I found Beta 1 was still slow, but I'm wondering if any improvements were made with the later release.)

As far as the "look" - MM's GUI does seem designed more for functionality than (eg) the eye-candy look of WMP 11, or the glossy simplicitude of iTunes. This is not to say MM doesn't look good (I like the blue skin) just not as pretty as some.

by **Blake** » Tue Oct 24, 2006 12:55 am

Steegy wrote: I wonder what blakeloth1 means with "The compatibility".

By that I mean the types of songs it can play and also that it can use Winamp
plugins/skins

by **pah68** » Mon Oct 23, 2006 10:52 pm

Hooah wrote:None of the above.

I like it for it's management ability. Easy to fix the tags. I also like how it can handle large libraries. 65k songs and MM chugs along.

Ditto

by **Hooah** » Mon Oct 23, 2006 8:44 pm

None of the above.

I like it for it's management ability. Easy to fix the tags. I also like how it can handle large libraries. 65k songs and MM chugs along.

by **Steegy** » Mon Oct 23, 2006 7:43 pm

I feel the same as Trixmoto

and

I wonder what blakeloth1 means with "The compatibility".

by **Lowlander** » Mon Oct 23, 2006 6:26 pm

I didn't choose MediaMonkey on looks, actually I choose no software on looks. I choose them on functionality, what they can do for me. If you talk about looks I would only consider MM and WMP as the rest really looks bad.
I also converted to MM before the current look and I actually like the look (blue skin not the new iTunes ripoff skin).
I myself came for DJ2000 which was really bad in comparison with MM. MM got me on it's management qualities as I mentioned above.

by **paulmt** » Mon Oct 23, 2006 5:51 pm

Well, I do like the look, but that's because I like a database type of layout.
Of course I would like to be able to skin more easily than the current skinning engine allows, but like others have said, for me it's the total package.
The ability to organise my music collection and present in a way I find appealing.
I also like the scripting ability of MM

So, I suppose my vote is "good all round player, though thats not exactly what I think either.

by **Blake** » Mon Oct 23, 2006 4:50 pm

I wonder why nobody is voting for the look? That might prove something.

by **Nebbin** » Mon Oct 23, 2006 11:53 am

I agree with the above that it's more about the ability to manage my collection than anything else. For a large music collection, I've found MM is in a league of it's own due to it's speed, compatibility and script customisation. Sure, there's more that I'd like to see (bring on v3!) but I'm happy with my choice so far.

Obviously I also use MM for general playback, but typically use N.I.'s Traktor for parties or other events. (Traktor, though, is far inferior in terms of compatibility and organisational tools hence my need for MM.)

by **Bex** » Mon Oct 23, 2006 5:22 am

Lowlander wrote:Because it's the best way to manage my music.

x2

by **trixmoto** » Mon Oct 23, 2006 4:19 am

I voted for scripts, but I feel bad about this in a way. The main reason I like MM is that it is so powerful and fast, and provides pretty much everything I need. But I do love this fact that I can create more custom workflows by writing my own scripts, which allows MM to continue being streamlined and not bloat with everyone's own idea of a good feature.

by **Lowlander** » Sun Oct 22, 2006 8:00 pm

Because it's the best way to manage my music.

Good Results for MM

Post a reply

Expand view Topic review: Good Results for MM

hmmm