by itsjsdi » Sun Jul 08, 2007 5:40 pm
When rating FLAC files is set a value 20 times the number of stars. that discrepates with other converters like dbpower, so those always rate 5 stars when converting from FLAC to WMA as, 20, 40, 60, 80, etc. are bigger than 5.
That does not happen for MP3 and WMA formats, as rating is exactly the number of stars (1,2,3,4,5) without multiplying by anything. dbpower also rates 1,2,3,4,5 (the number of stars) for FLAC files.
So, what is happening? Is there not some kind of specification about rating in order to everywhere use the same way?
Rating is a pain when looking for compatibility with other programs.
I can't use conversion to WMA LossLess with MM3a5 as it does not have the possibility to configure CD quality and I get files bigger thah even the corresponding WAV and a very high bitrate. But the quality is not bigger, as the source has a quality and that can't be improved, only maintained.
When rating FLAC files is set a value 20 times the number of stars. that discrepates with other converters like dbpower, so those always rate 5 stars when converting from FLAC to WMA as, 20, 40, 60, 80, etc. are bigger than 5.
That does not happen for MP3 and WMA formats, as rating is exactly the number of stars (1,2,3,4,5) without multiplying by anything. dbpower also rates 1,2,3,4,5 (the number of stars) for FLAC files.
So, what is happening? Is there not some kind of specification about rating in order to everywhere use the same way?
Rating is a pain when looking for compatibility with other programs.
I can't use conversion to WMA LossLess with MM3a5 as it does not have the possibility to configure CD quality and I get files bigger thah even the corresponding WAV and a very high bitrate. But the quality is not bigger, as the source has a quality and that can't be improved, only maintained.