media player for large libraries

Post a reply

Smilies
:D :) :( :o :-? 8) :lol: :x :P :oops: :cry: :evil: :roll: :wink:

BBCode is ON
[img] is ON
[url] is ON
Smilies are ON

Topic review
   

Expand view Topic review: media player for large libraries

by GSV3MiaC » Tue Aug 07, 2007 4:01 pm

Practically any player (even WMP) can handle 10GB of library, assuming it is 192 or 256kb/s MP3s or larger (it is the number of files and folders that kills them, not the size on disk .. heck in .wav that is only a dozen or so CDs).

When you get to 10k tracks or more (typically 50GB+) most players are struggling. Even MM take a while to retag that many, but it will manage them just fine.

As for portable players, I don't see a big problem with dragging an iAudio M5 (30GB) around, which with Rockbox on will handle 15k tracks or so pretty swiftly. For more portable, an iAudio 7 with 8GB of Flash will hold 400+ CDs, but you'll have to rip them in multi-track chunks because the stupid thing has a 2k file limit (and anyway gets very slow when dealing with lots of files and folders).

by Teknojnky » Tue Aug 07, 2007 2:40 pm

Foobar can handle pretty large libraries, however its default setup is very very simplistic and takes a lot of research and downloading plugins, with a steep learning curve on how to set it all up to your satisfaction.

by Hooah » Tue Aug 07, 2007 2:31 pm

You really only have iTunes, WMP11 or MusicMatch. But MediaMonkey trumps them all. And I have honestly tried every software player available. None come close to the sheer power or capabilities of Mediamonkey. Especially when I try to load any of the other players with my media library which is easily over 75x bigger then the size you stated.

by trixmoto » Thu Jul 19, 2007 4:02 am

@ilikeknives14 - call people idiots will certainly not endear them to answer your question sensibly. I however can rise above it - and I have never found another manager that can handle large libraries as well as MM. Presumably you think there is something wrong with MM?

by rovingcowboy » Wed Jul 18, 2007 5:38 pm

ilikeknives14 wrote:i mean other than mediamonkey what other players are god for big libraries
you idiots

i answered you and not in a jokeing manor or the manor of an idiot. and neither did any of the others.

it is not welcomed to be called one when not acting like one.

this is not a flame forum in flaming those that answer you here.
you infact limit the number of people that will really help you when you really need it.

by Blake » Wed Jul 18, 2007 5:16 pm

Well, it was a pretty stupid question to ask on these forums and you must have expected those responses?
I am guessing you want to hide the fact that you are the real idiot by calling other people idiots.

Answer to your question: There is none that can handle large librarys just like MM.
:P

by ilikeknives14 » Wed Jul 18, 2007 4:55 pm

i mean other than mediamonkey what other players are god for big libraries
you idiots

by rovingcowboy » Tue Jul 17, 2007 11:10 pm

no there is no point in going to the large portables as they are not worth the weight and cost trade off.
most of them are having some convince traded off for the large library storage.
such as the weight with the hard drives used. unless they have
been able to switch to use of newer lighter flash drives that can hold lots.

then you might be getting something but why carry that much around with you? 10 gb's is a lot of sound

the small 5 gb zen micro my sister has still is not filled up and it is not playing all the songs on it now in 8 hours of listening to it.

8)

and the others are right if your looking for computer media player then you found what you want in media monkey.

we're just getting the bugs out of the mm 3 alpha versions now.
so it will be really good when finished.

:D

by Bex » Tue Jul 17, 2007 8:40 pm

Perhaps ilikeknives14 are referring to a portable player?

by Nebbin » Tue Jul 17, 2007 8:34 pm

Welcome ilikeknives14.

It's not unthinkable that when asking such a question on MediaMonkey's forums that you get such a response :)

But... I can assure you that handling large databases of music is one of MediaMonkey's strengths. Many of us have libraries much larger than the one you propose, and having tried various alternatives, MediaMonkey keeps proving itself.

by nohitter151 » Tue Jul 17, 2007 6:02 pm

Umm, mediamonkey?

media player for large libraries

by ilikeknives14 » Tue Jul 17, 2007 5:58 pm

im looking for a media player that can handle large music libraries (like 10gb and up). any suggestions?

Top