> Tested to be started/installed on, not bug free
Uh??
Which means that no application is perfect if Windows 98 was perfect we would not have Windows XP or any other Hardware would not be designed. if EPROM was Perfect why we even bothered to make EEPROMs
So
http://download.cnet.com/MediaMonkey-St ... 09807.html
Operating system: Windows Vista, Windows 95, Windows Me, Windows 2000, Windows XP, Windows 7, Windows NT, Windows 98
refers to OSes on which MM will install and launch, not those on which it will work properly??
What use is it to a user to have a product that installs, starts, and then doesn't work properly?
Define, work properly? Personally I found no problems to use MM on Windows 98 for what I need to work on Windows 98 (Have old Win98 Laptop that used MM 2.5.5.998 and installed 3.1.2.1267 and it can play music without problems. Note that I turned off Skinning due lack of updated drivers from manufacturer and slow hardware performance but it was working out of box)
> For CD-Ripping and Burning ASPI drivers are needed to get functionality.
If MM doesn't include the libraries it needs, it should include them in the system requirements.
It does not exclusively need it to be started/installed/used and specific feature requirements are noted/sorted in knowledgebase.
> Also Note that Motherboards designed for Win98 are at least 9-10 years old which
> means that Capacitors on it can create many many issues on advanced software
Take it from this electronics engineer: that is nonsense and superstition.
That was I talked to people myself (I was not paying lots attention on classes too much my teenage "brain" was somewhere else) until I've seen that case more than few times. Especially as it is
known that
capacitors loose at least 20% of their characteristics over first few years of use. You are right that it is highly unlikely to be the case, but as engineer you should know that even Static electricity from accumulated dust can throw an system BSOD due the some spike over Memory Module and read address. Anyway sorry for mentioning that I wasn't thought that you would be understand it like that.
> MM can't play WMA 11 unless WMA 11 isn't supported in WMP for Win 98 and you are not
> able to obtain WM 11 Core codecs for Win 98. The list goes on ...
But the list doesn't go on the software specification, where it should do.
I think it does apply with these specs already known to user
http://www.microsoft.com/windows/window ... sions.aspx along with knowledge base, FAQ, ... Effort in continuing to give support for abandoned OS-es even limiting in some cases. For me any app that tries to maintain any sort of compatibility to old system is a plus.
Ventis could save a lot of wasted user time by being honest about the system requirements. List the OSs on which MM works properly. Assuming there are any.
This is what MS said also to all companies in the world when introduced Digital signing (WHQL) for every piece of apps and drivers (especially on that).
For example I have perfectly working WEB Cam that do not "Properly" (Can't be installed) under Windows 7 due the fact that Digital Driver signature is not paid to MS and Windows refuses to load driver unless I explicitly agree to use device (one "not properly" working) under Test and Development system settings where MS can't ensure anything as user will use non signed driver. I don't think that even manufacturers of OS-es can assure you that it will work properly with or without MediaMonkey.
> Do not get me wrong but PC that support/have Windows XP pre-installed can be bought for $30-$60
Then even less reason for Ventis to deceive customers by listing Win 98.
Decieve? You have not been able to install/start Free MediaMonkey on Win 98?
Every user have rights to test and chose application that works properly on his OS and hardware preferences and needs. That is why free versions exists.
I understand what you are saying and if I got it right Ventis should write something like it is written for purchasing games under Minimal requirements and Recommended requirements and or?