by Peke » Wed May 31, 2023 4:43 pm
Hi,
Rob_S wrote: ↑Wed May 31, 2023 10:12 am
OK, so I think many of the use cases you mention are highly unusual to say the least.
I am curious, as I have not seen any hardware or Software device that behave like MM 5.1 now, this include, Sonos, Onkyo, Yamaha, Pioneer, Sony, ... And as of software I tested 20+ apps and non permanently shuffles now playing when turning ON, but all revert to Added playback order when turned off. Do you have any app/hardware example that works like MM 5.1?
Rob_S wrote: ↑Wed May 31, 2023 10:12 amIf you choose to leave a carefully curated list unsaved for long periods of time, I suppose that is up to you.
My example was maybe bit extreme, I can give you much simpler example that after you turn shuffle on in order to get things back you will loose numerous clicks in order to do that.
Rob_S wrote: ↑Wed May 31, 2023 10:12 am
I think the default should be as it is now in 5.1
Here we agree 100%, I only disagree that shuffle execute permanent randomize on Now Playing because like 30+ years ago Shuffle is still temp feature and it should be reversible not permanent.
Rob_S wrote: ↑Wed May 31, 2023 10:12 am
When playing using this option, right click play now, previous track and next track could just be greyed out, as they never worked properly.
Exactly, that is why it needs to be correctly implemented as like you I think that current state of representing Shuffle is much better and I like it, but destructive nature to Now playing makes it unusable. If I wanted to Shuffle my Now playing i could do that 10+ years ago in MM3 with ⋮ -> Edit -> Randomize list and would get same thing as shuffle on in MM5.1, I do not need what I already had but I lost normal Shuffle I use for 30+ years.
Finally, YES current behavior is better as it fixes many many things that did not worked and if not Destructive it would make MM unique, but unfortunately at current state makes it unusable and removes many existing features from MM.
Have you even tried my sample spreadsheet that proves it does not need to be destructive while vastly improving MM behavior?
Even Dictionary words
Shuffle and
Ramdomize/
Random have different meanings, so it is not same thing.
Hi,
[quote=Rob_S post_id=510367 time=1685545955 user_id=112670]
OK, so I think many of the use cases you mention are highly unusual to say the least.
[/quote]I am curious, as I have not seen any hardware or Software device that behave like MM 5.1 now, this include, Sonos, Onkyo, Yamaha, Pioneer, Sony, ... And as of software I tested 20+ apps and non permanently shuffles now playing when turning ON, but all revert to Added playback order when turned off. Do you have any app/hardware example that works like MM 5.1?
[quote=Rob_S post_id=510367 time=1685545955 user_id=112670]If you choose to leave a carefully curated list unsaved for long periods of time, I suppose that is up to you.[/quote]My example was maybe bit extreme, I can give you much simpler example that after you turn shuffle on in order to get things back you will loose numerous clicks in order to do that.
[quote=Rob_S post_id=510367 time=1685545955 user_id=112670]
I think the default should be as it is now in 5.1
[/quote] Here we agree 100%, I only disagree that shuffle execute permanent randomize on Now Playing because like 30+ years ago Shuffle is still temp feature and it should be reversible not permanent.
[quote=Rob_S post_id=510367 time=1685545955 user_id=112670]
When playing using this option, right click play now, previous track and next track could just be greyed out, as they never worked properly.[/quote]Exactly, that is why it needs to be correctly implemented as like you I think that current state of representing Shuffle is much better and I like it, but destructive nature to Now playing makes it unusable. If I wanted to Shuffle my Now playing i could do that 10+ years ago in MM3 with ⋮ -> Edit -> Randomize list and would get same thing as shuffle on in MM5.1, I do not need what I already had but I lost normal Shuffle I use for 30+ years.
Finally, YES current behavior is better as it fixes many many things that did not worked and if not Destructive it would make MM unique, but unfortunately at current state makes it unusable and removes many existing features from MM.
Have you even tried my sample spreadsheet that proves it does not need to be destructive while vastly improving MM behavior?
Even Dictionary words [url=https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/shuffle]Shuffle[/url] and [url=https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/randomize]Ramdomize[/url]/[url=https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/random]Random[/url] have different meanings, so it is not same thing.