by rusty » Wed Nov 08, 2023 4:32 pm
We could add a new dialog, but I prefer not to add extra steps unless it's really necessary/valuable for most users.
Since it seems that the current 5.0.4 behavior is well understood, maybe we should allow for that behavior unless the new option below is enabled. e.g.:
[x] Only analyze files with unknown Leveling Adjustment
[ ] Automatically analyze volume of unanalyzed files
[x] When analyzing Track volume, also analyze Album volume
. . [x] Analyze all tracks on the album
If the last option is disabled, then the question is what should happen in case the user selects a subset of the album. Possible options:
a) Generate an incorrect Album leveling value
b) Leave the Album leveling value empty
c) 5s Toast message e.g. 'Some of the selected files are subsets of an album. Include all tracks (for accuracy)? [[Yes]] [No]' (might not be possible in the short term).
Thoughts?
-Rusty
We could add a new dialog, but I prefer not to add extra steps unless it's really necessary/valuable for most users.
Since it seems that the current 5.0.4 behavior is well understood, maybe we should allow for that behavior unless the new option below is enabled. e.g.:
[x] Only analyze files with unknown Leveling Adjustment
[ ] Automatically analyze volume of unanalyzed files
[x] When analyzing Track volume, also analyze Album volume
. . [x] Analyze all tracks on the album
If the last option is disabled, then the question is what should happen in case the user selects a subset of the album. Possible options:
a) Generate an incorrect Album leveling value
b) Leave the Album leveling value empty
c) 5s Toast message e.g. 'Some of the selected files are subsets of an album. Include all tracks (for accuracy)? [[Yes]] [No]' (might not be possible in the short term).
Thoughts?
-Rusty