by rusty » Mon Nov 01, 2021 4:05 pm
Hi xaphan,
Thanks for the feedback. I personally use .webp even for local images (higher quality/less storage) so I'm with you.
I haven't really looked into what containers support webp (I see that ID3 doesn't). Have you already looked into this? OR are you suggesting a sort of feature in which MM would auto-convert .webp artwork to a format that is supported by the tag format?
I guess that some sort of hybrid functionality would be required--native .webp for supported container formats, and auto-conversion otherwise? But Peke's point is also valid, if a user's library had a bunch of .webp artwork, then it may not display correctly on various devices to which it's synced or streamed.
-Rusty
Hi xaphan,
Thanks for the feedback. I personally use .webp even for local images (higher quality/less storage) so I'm with you.
I haven't really looked into what containers support webp (I see that ID3 doesn't). Have you already looked into this? OR are you suggesting a sort of feature in which MM would auto-convert .webp artwork to a format that is supported by the tag format?
I guess that some sort of hybrid functionality would be required--native .webp for supported container formats, and auto-conversion otherwise? But Peke's point is also valid, if a user's library had a bunch of .webp artwork, then it may not display correctly on various devices to which it's synced or streamed.
-Rusty