by TwiztidSinz » Sat Oct 06, 2007 1:08 pm
My answer: Yes and no...
MM3B3 uses ~60,000k+/-5,000k memory while playing and my library of 2590 files loaded.
iTunes uses ~43,000k having just loaded with no songs in the library and many options unchecked (if it makes a difference).
After importing my music iTunes jumps to about 52,800k and while playing, it averages around 55,000k~56,000k. Both while playing and while not playing, I saw iTunes jump up over 63,000k somewhat frequently.
MM3 is still in Beta, so there might be a problem with the memory management or some optimizations that they haven't gotten to yet.
Theres a lot of new stuff included with MediaMonkey, and it's also a more flexible player with skinning when looked at next to iTunes.
The best comparison I can make would be to look at Winamp 2 vs Winamp 3 in terms of performance (or Classic Skin vs Modern Skin in Winamp 5). Winamp 2 out performed Winamp 3 (Classic / Modern) because of simpler skins.
Look at MediaMonkey 2's skin vs MediaMonkey 3's skin, IMO the MM3 skins are much smoother and the overall look and feel is an improvement too -- The same as Winamp 3/Modern Skin's were. But unlike Winamp 3/Modern Skin, I don't think MediaMonkey 3 suffers in the performance department.
My answer: Yes and no...
MM3B3 uses ~60,000k+/-5,000k memory while playing and my library of 2590 files loaded.
iTunes uses ~43,000k having just loaded with no songs in the library and many options unchecked (if it makes a difference).
After importing my music iTunes jumps to about 52,800k and while playing, it averages around 55,000k~56,000k. Both while playing and while not playing, I saw iTunes jump up over 63,000k somewhat frequently.
MM3 is still in Beta, so there might be a problem with the memory management or some optimizations that they haven't gotten to yet.
Theres a lot of new stuff included with MediaMonkey, and it's also a more flexible player with skinning when looked at next to iTunes.
The best comparison I can make would be to look at Winamp 2 vs Winamp 3 in terms of performance (or Classic Skin vs Modern Skin in Winamp 5). Winamp 2 out performed Winamp 3 (Classic / Modern) because of simpler skins.
Look at MediaMonkey 2's skin vs MediaMonkey 3's skin, IMO the MM3 skins are much smoother and the overall look and feel is an improvement too -- The same as Winamp 3/Modern Skin's were. But unlike Winamp 3/Modern Skin, I don't think MediaMonkey 3 suffers in the performance department.