MM3 B3 Eats more memory?

Beta Testing for Windows Products and plugins

Moderator: Gurus

swears
Posts: 48
Joined: Wed Aug 08, 2007 10:23 pm

MM3 B3 Eats more memory?

Post by swears »

Is it just me, or is this Beta the biggest memory hog yet?
tiagoclaus
Posts: 55
Joined: Mon Mar 19, 2007 11:26 am
Location: São Paulo, Brazil
Contact:

Post by tiagoclaus »

Please, define "memory hog".
MM 3.0.3.1183, Windows Vista SP1 EN
Athlon X2 5200+, 4GB RAM, GeForce 8500GT

Image
TwiztidSinz
Posts: 146
Joined: Tue Sep 11, 2007 10:47 am
Contact:

Post by TwiztidSinz »

My answer: Yes and no...

MM3B3 uses ~60,000k+/-5,000k memory while playing and my library of 2590 files loaded.

iTunes uses ~43,000k having just loaded with no songs in the library and many options unchecked (if it makes a difference).
After importing my music iTunes jumps to about 52,800k and while playing, it averages around 55,000k~56,000k. Both while playing and while not playing, I saw iTunes jump up over 63,000k somewhat frequently.


MM3 is still in Beta, so there might be a problem with the memory management or some optimizations that they haven't gotten to yet.

Theres a lot of new stuff included with MediaMonkey, and it's also a more flexible player with skinning when looked at next to iTunes.
The best comparison I can make would be to look at Winamp 2 vs Winamp 3 in terms of performance (or Classic Skin vs Modern Skin in Winamp 5). Winamp 2 out performed Winamp 3 (Classic / Modern) because of simpler skins.
Look at MediaMonkey 2's skin vs MediaMonkey 3's skin, IMO the MM3 skins are much smoother and the overall look and feel is an improvement too -- The same as Winamp 3/Modern Skin's were. But unlike Winamp 3/Modern Skin, I don't think MediaMonkey 3 suffers in the performance department.
Motherboard: Intel D915PBL
Processor: Intel Pentium 4 550 Prescott 3.4GHz LGA 775 (w/ Hyper-Threading)
Memory: Corsair 2048MB (512x4) DDR2 533 (PC2 4200) Dual Channel
Hard Drive: Western Digital WD800JD 80 GB / WD2500JS 250 GB / WD2500KS 250 GB
Video Card: Sapphire RADEON X1600 XT 256MB 128-bit GDDR3 PCI Express x16
rovingcowboy
Posts: 14163
Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2003 7:57 am
Location: (Texas)
Contact:

Post by rovingcowboy »

as mentioned it is kind of a mem hog. just depends on what you are having it do.

8)
roving cowboy / keith hall. My skins http://www.mediamonkey.com/forum/viewto ... =9&t=16724 for some help check on Monkey's helpful messages at http://www.mediamonkey.com/forum/viewto ... 4008#44008 MY SYSTEMS.1.Jukebox WinXp pro sp 3 version 3.5 gigabyte mb. 281 GHz amd athlon x2 240 built by me.) 2.WinXP pro sp3, vers 2.5.5 and vers 3.5 backup storage, shuttle 32a mb,734 MHz amd athlon put together by me.) 3.Dell demension, winxp pro sp3, mm3.5 spare jukebox.) 4.WinXp pro sp3, vers 3.5, dad's computer bought from computer store. )5. Samsung Galaxy A51 5G Android ) 6. amd a8-5600 apu 3.60ghz mm version 4 windows 7 pro bought from computer store.
TwiztidSinz
Posts: 146
Joined: Tue Sep 11, 2007 10:47 am
Contact:

Post by TwiztidSinz »

The point I was trying to make was...

While it -does- use a fair amount of RAM, especially when compared to smaller players (Such as Winamp5 in Classic Skin mode), it's right on par with iTunes and you get things like skinning which iTunes doesnt have.

I'd also like to point out that right now MediaMonkey3 Beta3 is using ~44,750k and I've had it open for a while on random play. So maybe the numbers I listed last night were a bit higher than normal.
Motherboard: Intel D915PBL
Processor: Intel Pentium 4 550 Prescott 3.4GHz LGA 775 (w/ Hyper-Threading)
Memory: Corsair 2048MB (512x4) DDR2 533 (PC2 4200) Dual Channel
Hard Drive: Western Digital WD800JD 80 GB / WD2500JS 250 GB / WD2500KS 250 GB
Video Card: Sapphire RADEON X1600 XT 256MB 128-bit GDDR3 PCI Express x16
Peke
Posts: 18711
Joined: Tue Jun 10, 2003 7:21 pm
Location: Earth
Contact:

Post by Peke »

Possibly, I suggest that we wait till MM3 Final is out and we have clean non-debug version in hands without thousands of CODE lines, lots of internal testers, watchers, reporters, .... loaded into MediaMonkey to test speed and memory hogging.

EDIT: Regarding Memory Hog, last night I loaded Acrobat reader 8 to read one of my coding E-Books I couldn't beleive my eyes Acrobat Reader 8 with loaded E-Book took 600Mb +/- 20Mb of my RAM :) Repeated same proces on My mothers Computer with Acrobat reader 7 and it Took ~85Mb. E-Book is 65MB PDF
Best regards,
Peke
MediaMonkey Team lead QA/Tech Support guru
Admin of Free MediaMonkey addon Site HappyMonkeying
Image
Image
Image
How to attach PICTURE/SCREENSHOTS to forum posts
Johonn
Posts: 7
Joined: Thu Jun 15, 2006 8:17 pm

Post by Johonn »

haha, i was at 400+ megs of RAM today. Currently with a restart i am using 125 megs, +/- 20 megs. depending on how many songs i am viewing. I only noticed the memory usage today because Vista told me i was low on memory. To be honest it was running very slow on switching to a new song.

Yea, my PC has been on for a little more then 10 days and well MM was most likely on the same amount. I also was on Beta 2 and just moved up to beta 3 tonight.
rusty
Posts: 9081
Joined: Tue Apr 29, 2003 3:39 am
Location: Montreal, Canada

mm performance

Post by rusty »

fyi, there will be further optimizations before release. also, debug code will be removed so that might have a bit of an impact as well.

-Rusty
Post Reply