Search found 609 matches
- Wed Feb 04, 2026 11:30 am
- Forum: Need help (mma)
- Topic: Wired Sync for FLAC files
- Replies: 3
- Views: 40
Re: Wired Sync for FLAC files
Comcast internet, S24+, I thought the 6 year old PC would be the drag?
- Tue Feb 03, 2026 8:27 pm
- Forum: Need help (mma)
- Topic: Wired Sync for FLAC files
- Replies: 3
- Views: 40
Re: Wired Sync for FLAC files
The desktop PC is 6 years old. My S24+ phone probably has a much faster WiFi than the PC. Would it be worth it to add a thumb drive USB internet to it as a try to speed things up during a WiFi sync?
- Tue Feb 03, 2026 6:25 pm
- Forum: Need help (mma)
- Topic: Wired Sync for FLAC files
- Replies: 3
- Views: 40
Wired Sync for FLAC files
I have noticed that FLAC takes longer when doing a WiFi sync from MMA. I wanted to connect a wire [USB-C] cable and start the sync from my PC with MM5 installed. Could not figure it out. I just assumed the wired sync would be much faster.
EDIT: Oops. The USB-C cable got disconnected from the PC.
EDIT: Oops. The USB-C cable got disconnected from the PC.
- Fri Jan 30, 2026 7:34 pm
- Forum: Beta testing, bugs, and feature requests - MMW 2024
- Topic: https://www.mediamonkey.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=86639&sd=d
- Replies: 1
- Views: 65
https://www.mediamonkey.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=86639&sd=d
I am bit confused here. Should I just upgrade with latest build?
- Sun Jan 11, 2026 9:35 am
- Forum: Need help (mma)
- Topic: MMA Switch between earbuds and A/V [21819]
- Replies: 3
- Views: 1433
Re: MMA Switch between earbuds and A/V
Thanks for the feedback. Added at: https://www.ventismedia.com/mantis/view.php?id=21819 Note: If you stop casting, and then re-initiate playback and connect your headphones, it should work. If you don't want to re-initiate playback manually, try enabling Options > Playback > Resume Play on ...
- Sat Jan 10, 2026 5:30 pm
- Forum: Need help (mma)
- Topic: Timeless Track Sort Off [#21916]
- Replies: 19
- Views: 1076
Re: Timeless Track Sort Off [#21916]
Yes I did a WiFi Sync from MMA to test. It seemed to check all 17194 files. Also, someone tell me how to get MM5 [or MMA] to tell me how many files there are in total in my collection? Q: Should I uncheck "Scan file directories for Artwork" and try again? EDIT: Oh, yeah. I unchecked and the next ...
- Fri Jan 09, 2026 7:41 pm
- Forum: Need help (mma)
- Topic: Timeless Track Sort Off [#21916]
- Replies: 19
- Views: 1076
Re: Timeless Track Sort Off [#21916]
Is this, "Scan file directories for Artwork", the option in question? Or, is it something else?Lowlander wrote: ↑Fri Jan 09, 2026 7:24 pm There already is an option to scan (or not) for external Artworks.
- Fri Jan 09, 2026 7:10 pm
- Forum: Need help (mma)
- Topic: Timeless Track Sort Off [#21916]
- Replies: 19
- Views: 1076
Re: Timeless Track Sort Off
Problem was fixed, it should be a lot better from the next beta build. Scan time could be somehow slower, because new version now checks also existence of external artworks during rescan (we consider to make it optional too), but the main problem was related to the unwanted "updated" flag assigned ...
- Tue Jan 06, 2026 6:32 pm
- Forum: Need help (mma)
- Topic: Timeless Track Sort Off [#21916]
- Replies: 19
- Views: 1076
Re: Timeless Track Sort Off
Subsequent scans still show large amount of updated files? Yes. That's why I ran the Add/Rescan and got the same number of updated files. Something is wrong here. That's why I hoping that @PeKe could do a "Remote Session". EDIT: One thing we can agree on is that if you run Add/Rescan twice in a row ...
- Tue Jan 06, 2026 6:11 pm
- Forum: Need help (mma)
- Topic: Timeless Track Sort Off [#21916]
- Replies: 19
- Views: 1076
Re: Timeless Track Sort Off
It is actually slower as more is read during scanning. This is still being fine tuned. I made sure that "Manual" was selected and not "Manual and Continuously". Scan results has been reporting 17,140 updated files. I am not sure what that means. I just did two Add/Rescans in a row. This is not what ...
- Tue Jan 06, 2026 5:46 pm
- Forum: Need help (mma)
- Topic: Timeless Track Sort Off [#21916]
- Replies: 19
- Views: 1076
Re: Timeless Track Sort Off
Were files updated outside of MediaMonkey? It would explain both. Is every scan of the same folder slow? Did you set MediaMonkey to rescan each file ? 1. Whenever i make changes using Windows Explorer, I add/rescan to pick up any changes. But, yes, it's probably better to use Add/Change. 2. The ...
- Mon Jan 05, 2026 5:51 pm
- Forum: Need help (mma)
- Topic: Timeless Track Sort Off [#21916]
- Replies: 19
- Views: 1076
Re: Timeless Track Sort Off
Track 17 now appears between Tracks 3 and 4. Weird stuff. I think I did another sync from MMA.
EDIT: There is something changed in this version of MM5. Add/Rescan is MUCH slower than in previous version. And, in MMA, WiFi sync is abysmally slower than before? What's going on here?
EDIT: There is something changed in this version of MM5. Add/Rescan is MUCH slower than in previous version. And, in MMA, WiFi sync is abysmally slower than before? What's going on here?
- Mon Jan 05, 2026 3:43 pm
- Forum: Need help (mma)
- Topic: Timeless Track Sort Off [#21916]
- Replies: 19
- Views: 1076
- Sun Jan 04, 2026 6:21 pm
- Forum: Need help (mma)
- Topic: Timeless Track Sort Off [#21916]
- Replies: 19
- Views: 1076
Re: Timeless Track Sort Off
The only difference is that Artist is different. Some tracks add another artist along with Meghan Trainor. Album Artist is the same for all tracks. [I removed all Disc #'s because I have been told that MMA might not handle them well?]
- Sun Jan 04, 2026 6:08 pm
- Forum: Need help (mma)
- Topic: Timeless Track Sort Off [#21916]
- Replies: 19
- Views: 1076
Timeless Track Sort Off [#21916]
This is Meghan Trainor's latest album. I originally had 16 tracks. All fine with MMA. I added Track 17 in MM5 when it became available. I had to adjust several tags and removed Disc IDs, etc. Did a sync in MMA and Track 17 sorts at the top of the list now rather than at the bottom [after Track 16 ...