ScrobblerDJ v1.26, Let your music free!!!

Bex · Post by **Bex** » Thu Oct 26, 2006 6:58 pm

psyxonova, here are some nice words about your beautiful script!
http://www.nickelarcade.net/freq/2006/1 ... ndom-play/

Teknojnky · Post by **Teknojnky** » Fri Oct 27, 2006 8:45 am

Haha thats awesome!

psyXonova · Post by **psyXonova** » Sat Oct 28, 2006 2:10 pm

Thnks for the link Bex...
It it a really nice post...
I enjoyed it

Guest · Post by **Guest** » Tue Nov 14, 2006 6:41 pm

will scrobbler dj will ever be updated?

i guess this year is out

ANGER · Post by **ANGER** » Tue Nov 14, 2006 6:48 pm

YOU PUTON! Your development cycle is slowest thing ive ever seen! My two year old could of released a update faster than this!

DaledeSilva · Post by **DaledeSilva** » Tue Nov 14, 2006 6:54 pm

ANGER (Guest)...

wow... a guest saying mean words again..

at least log in as yourself so we can block you.

have you paid psyxonova for his script.. no.. then shut up... if his development cycle were any faster.. then he'd probably be using up time for PAID work...

If you have so much free time then learn to program and do it yourself.

Guest · Post by **Guest** » Tue Nov 14, 2006 7:01 pm

Thank you DaledeSilva! That's exactly what I wrote over two months ago. I suggested that the original author submit to us whatever he has done for the new features (he sure talked it up like there was something big coming, said something to the effect of "all new features will be implemented plus much more") and then the rest of could finish it off. Over two months ago the original author replied saying that was what he as going to do. So yes, I agree with you, please give me what you have and I'll finish it up for myself. Of course, the reason this hasn't happened is because the original author overpromised and underdelivered. There is no work already done so there cannot be an "alpha" release for us to finish up. All we have is what has already been released, so yeah, we'll have to do the new features all by ourselves I guess. You are precisely right!!

Guest · Post by **Guest** » Tue Nov 14, 2006 7:01 pm

http://mediamonkey.com/forum/viewtopic. ... f03c#58930

oops, yeah, there's the link

DaledeSilva · Post by **DaledeSilva** » Tue Nov 14, 2006 7:16 pm

because of your guest login... I can't be sure if you're guest or angry guest...

if you're guest... when I wrote my previous post I included you.. but then decided you did not say anything bad.. and deleted your name from it.. from the quickness of your post, I assume that you posted while I was editing...
so I apologise for the mistake.

However.. yes.. while it would have been nice for him to deliver on what he mentioned.. I know for me, a month is a very short time and there a million random reasons he might have stalled.

so there's still no need to get angry at anyone who's doing you a FAVOUR.

this is an assumption and an insult.
"There is no work already done so there cannot be an "alpha" release for us to finish up"

Dale.

ANGER · Post by **ANGER** » Tue Nov 14, 2006 7:17 pm

I would be more than happy to work on finishing it! Point here is that people are waiting in anticipation for this script that he said was coming "soon"! Now I can’t speak for everyone but I am sure that there are plenty of people here willing to work on this as a collaborative effort. If you are stuck ask for help, but don’t make promises that you have no intention of keeping!

ANGER · Post by **ANGER** » Tue Nov 14, 2006 7:20 pm

One more thing...

I would gladly pay him for a WORKING script!

Guest · Post by **Guest** » Tue Nov 14, 2006 7:29 pm

I'm with you Dale, if it really was just a month people wouldn't feel like they have been lied to. Anger and I different people both feeling mostly the same way (though I'm not so eager to throw money down). But it hasn't just been a month, it's been since at least June that we've been told repeatedly that a major update is on the way. This is why I say nothing has been done, there's no evidence that anything has been done other than empty promises. Promises to for a new version with all requested features in it. Promises to release an alpha soon. Promises, promises but that is all.

DaledeSilva · Post by **DaledeSilva** » Tue Nov 14, 2006 7:30 pm

I absolutely agree with you (ANGER).. there are methods that can be used to share the workload etc. etc. blah blah..

But it is still rude to get angry about it.
Not only that, but your methods probably harm any desire he has to do what you say as well.

doesn't the fact that you're signed in as a guest indicate to you that you're going about it badly?

DaledeSilva · Post by **DaledeSilva** » Tue Nov 14, 2006 7:41 pm

you are right Guest...

If he's not meeting milestones he has said he'd meet then, Psyxonova, it would be nice to hear from you and get some 'realistic' answers.

However, careful you don't step over that line and right comments like ANGER...

I've got a script on the way that's been in development a long time. But I am a very busy person at times and don't like the idea of releasing it with some sort of bug and then not having time to fix it for a while...only to cop insults for what was originally a nice gesture.

Abusing the author does not only prevent the specific scripter from having the desire to do any more for you... but comments like these can also do that same for other scripters.

Guest · Post by **Guest** » Tue Nov 14, 2006 7:41 pm

No, just the opposite in fact. Why are professor reviews at the end of a semester anonymous? So you get the truth without fear of punishment. Why create an account so I can get blocked when someone gets upset with the message or the delivery of the message? Just spit juice and inflict truth.