It avoids the problem described in this post:Onweerwolf wrote:Could someone explain to me what this means:
5215 Added [Playlist / Search] Implement sort by DATEAdded (not DateTimeAdded)
http://www.mediamonkey.com/forum/viewto ... um#p244018
Moderator: Gurus
It avoids the problem described in this post:Onweerwolf wrote:Could someone explain to me what this means:
5215 Added [Playlist / Search] Implement sort by DATEAdded (not DateTimeAdded)
Thnx! I'm not exactly sure if i understand this though.nohitter151 wrote:It avoids the problem described in this post:Onweerwolf wrote:Could someone explain to me what this means:
5215 Added [Playlist / Search] Implement sort by DATEAdded (not DateTimeAdded)
http://www.mediamonkey.com/forum/viewto ... um#p244018



MM needs to become "prettier" because at some point in time, you will have no tagging or organizing left to do and only actually play your music. That's when being "pretty" will become important and changing to a "prettier" player will become an option for many MM users.gilesjp wrote:The update to version four is great. Sure MM is ugly, nothing new about that. However, as far as getting things done like tagging,reporting and organizing its the best out here and sounds great...."
Yep.rovingcowboy wrote:beauty is in the eye of the beholder
Off course it is, but no matter what way you look, there are a lot of...hmmm "whining and complaining" about the looks of MM. It's no big secret and there's no big elephant in the room. It's needs "tweeking" that's for sure.Lowlander wrote:Yep.rovingcowboy wrote:beauty is in the eye of the beholder
I'm wondering about DVD ripping too, I would assume it won't be included as most DVD's would require DRM circumvention to be ripped which is a legal minefield.